My article on a new fighter jet concept received the highest impression among all my articles. Unfortunately, it is not well understood. I just proposed a dual-purpose fighter jet to be among the arsenal of an army. It is not a replacement of an F35. Don't forget that chess boards are composed of different type of pieces. All my military propositions are based on cost effective solutions to keep the economy stronger. Military gadgets and arsenal have no meaning without a strong economy.
The decisive military actions are achieved by missiles. The jets or drones are just the carriers of these missiles. In the age of supersonic intelligent missiles, there is less need for dog fighting jet planes. The strategy I propose is to deploy as much defensive and offensive missile as possible to the battlefield. Increasing the point of attack or defend would increase the success rate. When you outnumber an advanced fighter jet with more missile carrying planes, the advanced plane has almost no chance. During World War 2, German battleship Bismarck lost the battle against the outnumbering less capable battleships. Given all planes carry the same type of missile, more planes with more line of fire and more missile would eventually win the war.
Stealth planes are only invisible to radar waves, but they are visible to sound detectors, light sensors, thermal sensors and the satellites. When you form a virtual wall made of fuel-efficient patrolling planes that carry considerable amount of missile, the very expensive stealth planes have limited effect. Additionally, the planes are propose are more capable than all the military drones available at the moment. Their dual purpose capability is a big bonus as well.
Importantly, commercial engine-based fighter jet would have less burden on military R&D which strengthens the economy.
As a conclusion, the dual-purpose fighter jet I propose has considerable advantages over many fighter jets and drones.
No comments :
Post a Comment